Democracy
Authors
Gi-Wook Shin
Haley Gordon
Hannah June Kim
News Type
Commentary
Date
Paragraphs

This article first appeared in the online magazine American Purpose.  

On March 9, South Koreans head to the voting booths to elect their new president. Although conventional wisdom posits that foreign affairs have little effect on voting preferences, South Koreans have defied this prediction in the past—and now, they may once again. Indeed, the atmosphere in this year’s election recalls that of 2002, when anti-American sentiments swept the South Korean presidential election. This time, it may be anti-Chinese sentiments that make an impact.


Sign up for APARC newsletters to receive our experts' commentary and analysis.


According to our survey of over one thousand South Koreans, conducted this past January, a large majority of respondents—78 percent—indicated that Republic of Korea (ROK)-China relations will be an important consideration when deciding which presidential candidate to vote for. Given that younger South Koreans are expected to be the deciding factor in this election, it is particularly significant that the figure rises to 82 percent for respondents in their twenties. Twenty years ago, anti-American sentiments tipped the vote in favor of Roh Moo-hyun, the liberal candidate, who pledged not to kowtow to the United States. This time, how will anti-Chinese sentiment play out in Seoul? Will it work in favor of the conservatives, who tend to be tougher on China and emphasize the U.S.-ROK alliance? And what does this mean for Washington?

Read More

Young people protesting in South Korea
Commentary

South Koreans Are Rethinking What China Means to Their Nation

A new study illuminates the potential effects of anti-Chinese sentiment in Korea.
South Koreans Are Rethinking What China Means to Their Nation
Yoon Seok-Youl
Commentary

What Does Korea’s 2022 Presidential Election Mean for Its Democracy?

The ongoing South Korean presidential race holds significant sociopolitical implications for the future of democracy as democratic backsliding has now become an undeniable reality in South Korea.
What Does Korea’s 2022 Presidential Election Mean for Its Democracy?
Members of the K-pop band BTS.
News

“K-Pop Stars, Too, Should Speak Out on Human Rights Issues,” Says Stanford Sociologist Gi-Wook Shin

K-pop and North Korean human rights are the subjects of two documentaries to be released this spring to mark the 20th anniversary of Stanford University’s Korea Program, reveals Professor Gi-Wook Shin.
“K-Pop Stars, Too, Should Speak Out on Human Rights Issues,” Says Stanford Sociologist Gi-Wook Shin
Hero Image
3D illustration of voter on a background of South Korea flag
All News button
1
Subtitle

Anti-Chinese sentiment surges—especially among the young—in advance of the March 9 elections.

Paragraphs
3D mockup cover of APARC's volume 'South Korea's Democracy in Crisis'

Like in many other states worldwide, democracy is in trouble in South Korea, entering a state of regression in the past decade, barely thirty years after its emergence in 1987. The society that recently had ordinary citizens leading “candlelight protests” demanding the impeachment of Park Geun-hye in 2016-17 has become polarized amid an upsurge of populism, driven by persistent structural inequalities, globalization, and the rise of the information society. 

The symptoms of democratic decline are increasingly hard to miss: political opponents are demonized, democratic norms are eroded, and the independence of the courts is whittled away. Perhaps most disturbing is that this all takes place under a government dominated by former pro-democracy activists.

The contributors to this volume trace the sources of illiberalism in today’s Korea; examine how political polarization is plaguing its party system; discuss how civil society and the courts have become politicized; look at the roles of inequality, education, and social media in the country’s democratic decline; and consider how illiberalism has affected Korea’s foreign policy. 

Table of Contents

Introduction
Korea’s Democratic Decay: Worrisome Trends and Pressing Challenges
Gi-Wook Shin and Ho-Ki Kim

1. Why Is Korean Democracy Majoritarian but Not Liberal?
Byongjin Ahn

2. Uses and Misuses of Nationalism in the Democratic Politics of Korea
Aram Hur

3. The Weakness of Party Politics and Rise of Populism in Korea
Kwanhu Lee

4. The Politicization of Civil Society: No Longer Watchdogs of Power, Former Democratic Activists Are Becoming New Authoritarian Leaders 
Myoung-Ho Park

5. The Politicization of the Judiciary in Korea: Challenges in Maintaining the Balance of Power
Seongwook Heo

6. Two Divergences in Korea’s Economy and Democracy: Regional and Generational Disparities
Jun-Ho Jeong and Il-Young Lee

7. Democracy and the Educational System in Korea 
Seongsoo Choi

8. Social Media and the Salience of Polarization in Korea
Yong Suk Lee

9. Illiberalism in Korean Foreign Policy
Victor Cha

10. The Democratic Recession: A Global and Comparative Perspective
Larry Diamond

Epilogue
Korea’s 2022 Presidential Election: Populism in the Post-Truth Era
Ho-Ki Kim and Gi-Wook Shin

Media Coverage

To celebrate the publication of South Korea's Democracy in Crisis, APARC held a book launch seminar in Seoul on June 14, 2022. The event received extensive coverage in Korean media, including the following:

Desk, examination, or review copies can be requested through Stanford University Press.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Books
Publication Date
Subtitle

The Threats of Illiberalism, Populism, and Polarization

Authors
Gi-Wook Shin
Book Publisher
Shorenstein APARC
-

This event is co-sponsored by  Center for South Asia and is part of Shorenstein APARC's winter 2022 webinar series, New Frontiers: Technology, Politics, and Society in the Asia-Pacific

How does India’s democratic system foster or impede the country’s command of key technologies? Conversely, how can technology reinforce or undermine the health of Indian democracy? Technological expertise and democratic vitality are both widely viewed as central features of Indian national identity and sources of Indian national power. But technology and democracy interact in complex and sometimes surprising ways. This webinar will explore how the Indian state can harness technology, and how technology impacts its democratic credentials – especially with the emergence of revolutionary new technologies, and the continuing evolution of the Indian political landscape.

Speakers:
Arun SukumarArun Mohan Sukumar is a PhD candidate at The Fletcher School, Tufts University, and a pre-doctoral research fellow at Fletcher’s Centre for International Law and Governance. He previously headed the Cyber Initiative at the Observer Research Foundation, one of India’s biggest think-tanks. His first book, Midnight’s Machines: A Political History of Technology in India, won the Ramnath Goenka Award for Non-Fiction (2019) and was shortlisted for several other awards. Arun was previously a member of World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on the Digital Economy and Society, and appointed by India’s National Security Advisor to a 'Study Group on Cyber Norms' that advised the Indian government on a national strategy towards the development and negotiation of global cybersecurity norms.

Julie OwonoJulie Owono is the Executive Director of the Content Policy & Society Lab (CPSL) and a fellow of the Program on Democracy and the Internet (PDI) at Stanford University. She is also the Executive Director of digital rights organization Internet Sans Frontières, one of the inaugural members of the Facebook Oversight Board, and an affiliate at the Berkman Klein Center at Harvard University. She holds a Master’s degree in International Law from la Sorbonne University in Paris, and practiced as a lawyer at the Paris Bar. Julie is a member of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI) created by France and Canada, as well as a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on AI for Humanity, and of the WEF Council on the Connected World.

Arzan Tarapore, South Asia Research Scholar of APARC at Stanford University, will moderate the discussion.

Via Zoom. Register at  https://bit.ly/3KQ6JZ8

Seminars
Paragraphs

Shorenstein APARC's annual report for the academic year 2020-21 is now available.

Learn about the research, events, and publications produced by the Center's programs over the last twelve months. Feature sections look at how APARC has researched threats to democracy and human rights in Asia, including new and upcoming books on North Korea and Southeast Asia, and the Center's research on the new administration's Asia policy. Catch up on the Center's policy work, education initiatives, events, and outreach.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Annual Reports
Publication Date
Authors
Callista Wells
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

On October 6, 2021, the APARC China Program hosted the panel program, "Engaging China: Fifty Years of Sino-American Relations." In honor of her recently released book of the same title, Director of the Grassroots China Initiative Anne Thurston was joined by contributors Mary Bullock, President Emerita of Agnes Scott College; Thomas Fingar, Shorenstein APARC Fellow; and David M. Lampton, Professor Emeritus at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Thomas Fingar also moderated the panel.

Recent years have seen the U.S.-China relationship rapidly deteriorate. Engaging China brings together leading China specialists—ranging from academics to NGO leaders to former government officials—to analyze the past, present, and future of U.S.-China relations.

During their panel, Bullock, Fingar, Lampton, and Thurston reflected upon the complex and multifaceted nature of American engagement with China since the waning days of Mao’s rule. What initially motivated U.S.’ rapprochement with China? Until recent years, what logic and processes have underpinned the U.S. foreign policy posture towards China? What were the gains and the missteps made during five decades of America’s engagement policy toward China? What is the significance of our rapidly deteriorating bilateral relations today? Watch now: 

For more information about Engaging China or to purchase a copy, please click here.

Read More

Xi and Biden
Q&As

Biden, Xi Will Want To Diminish Exaggerated Characterizations of Bilateral Friction, Stanford Scholar Says

In this Q&A, Stanford scholar Thomas Fingar discusses what to expect when President Biden meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Biden, Xi Will Want To Diminish Exaggerated Characterizations of Bilateral Friction, Stanford Scholar Says
Taiwan
Commentary

America's Future in Taiwan

Intensifying threats of a military conflict over Taiwan have brought uncertainty to the stability of regional security for Southeast Asia, according to Center Fellow Oriana Skylar Mastro on radio show On Point.
America's Future in Taiwan
USS Key West during during joint Australian-United States military exercises Talisman Sabre 2019 in the Coral Sea.
Commentary

In Defense of AUKUS

This is not only about nuclear-powered submarines; it is about a strengthened US commitment to Australia.
In Defense of AUKUS
Hero Image
"Engaging China: Fifty Years of Sino-American Relations" book cover
All News button
1
Subtitle

Was the strategy of engagement with China worthwhile? Experts Mary Bullock, Thomas Fingar, David M. Lampton, and Anne Thurston discuss their recent release, "Engaging China: Fifty Years of Sino-American Relations."

Authors
Noa Ronkin
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

In summer 2019, Burmese journalist and human rights defender Swe Win had to flee Myanmar with his family, fearing for their safety after surviving an assassination attempt coordinated by an army chief. The attack came after Myanmar Now, the Yangon-based, independent news outlet that Swe Win leads, had published investigative reports on the business interests of Min Aung Hlaing, Myanmar's armed forces commander-in-chief.

The COVID-19 pandemic derailed Swe Win’s plans to return to the country ahead of the national elections the following year. Then, on February 1, 2021, everything changed when the military seized power in a coup, ousting the democratically-elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi. “The coup has put an abrupt end to Myanmar people’s hopes for liberty and democracy,” said Swe Win, the recipient of APARC’s 2021 Shorenstein Journalism Award, at the award ceremony. “Every form of free speech is brutally suppressed. There is no space left for any freedom.”

Transcript of Swe Win's award acceptance remarks.
Download pdf

[Watch more APARC events and subscribe to our YouTube channel.


One victim of the coup has been Myanmar’s independent press. Like other news organizations and publications, Myanmar Now saw its newsroom raided, its operating license revoked, and its website blocked, and most of its staff were forced to flee to territories alongside the country's border areas. Swe Win leads the news outlet from exile while his team, in hiding, courageously continues to report on what is happening in the country.

The future of the media in Myanmar is bleak. State-run news outlets have now begun to support military propaganda. There are no options left for professional reporters to work independently under the junta.
Swe Win
2021 Shorenstein Journalism Award Recipient

Speaking at the Shorenstein award’s twentieth annual discussion, which was held virtually on October 12, 2021, Swe Win described Myanmar’s post-coup assault on the free press. “Newsgathering on the ground, in Yangon and other parts of the country, is very dangerous,” he said. Reporters inside the country are subject to an unprecedented level of surveillance, can no longer identify themselves as working with Myanmar Now or other news organizations, and risk their lives with every interview they conduct.

Any criticism of the military junta, even a mere suggestion of sympathy with the resistance movement, is easily interpreted as indicating dissidence and leads to immediate arrests. “The future of the media in Myanmar is bleak,” Swe Win said. “Under the military junta, there are no options left for professional reporters to work independently.”

The award event also included a discussion with Eileen Donahoe, the executive director of the Global Digital Policy Incubator (GDPI) at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center, and Scot Marciel, a career diplomat, former U.S. ambassador to Myanmar, and currently a visiting practitioner fellow on Southeast Asia at APARC. Southeast Asia Program Director Donald K. Emmerson chaired the discussion.

Unflinching Pursuit of Truth

The Shorenstein Journalism Award recognizes accomplished journalists who have significantly contributed to a greater understanding of the complexities of Asia. It alternates between recipients affiliated mostly with American news media and those primarily affiliated with Asian news media, who often also work on the frontline of the battle to defend press freedom in their home countries. The 2019 awardee in that category is Maria Ressa, winner of the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize.

“The Shorenstein Award has put a spotlight on courageous journalists around the world for a long time, and our honoree this year richly deserves its recognition,” noted Raju Narisetti, director of global publishing at McKinsey & Company and a member of the selection committee for the Shorenstein Journalism Award, as he introduced Swe Win. “From a very young age, he set off on a path to speaking truth to power — something that he has passionately done at a heavy price.”

To us, journalism is like science, its power is in the truth – that is what’s driving us.
Swe Win
2021 Shorenstein Journalism Award Recipient

Swe Win launched his journalism career after being held for seven years as a political prisoner on national security-related charges for joining the democracy movement as a college student. Throughout his career, Swe Win has shined a light on human rights cases that involve physical injury, death, unlawful detention, and miscarriage of justice in Myanmar. Under his leadership, Myanmar Now has gained recognition for its unflinching reports of crimes against the Rohingya and spotlights on the lives of Myanmar’s impoverished communities, for criticizing ultranationalist Buddhist monks, and for its bold coverage of Aung San Suu Kyi’s administration and the Myanmar military, the Tatmadaw.

On multiple occasions, Swe Win had to defend himself against physical attacks and frivolous litigation intended to derail the reporting of Myanmar Now. “To us, journalism is like science, its power is in the truth – that is what’s driving us […] We do not mix activism with journalistic work, but rather let the facts tell the story,” he replied when asked how he balances the roles of a journalist and a human rights defender.

Eileen Donahoe and Scot Marciel
Eileen Donahoe and Scot Marciel

The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism

Donahoe, who served in the Obama administration as the first U.S. ambassador to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva during the period when Myanmar seemed as if it was transitioning to a functioning democracy, described the sense of hope and optimism at that time and how disheartening it is “to recognize how much we can go backward in just a decade of time.”

In her current role, Donahoe leads GDPI’s efforts to advance policies that reinforce human rights and democratic values in a digitized society. She emphasized the need to recognize both the risks of digital disinformation and techno-authoritarianism, on the one hand, and the importance of digital technologies for human rights defenders, journalists, and civil society actors, who depend on them to do their work. “The problem is that the same tools that serve very beneficial purposes in society are now being weaponized by maligned actors. Unfortunately, this is a geopolitical trend, what I would call digital authoritarianism.”

The Myanmar Coup: Regional and International Implications

The coverage of the Myanmar coup and its aftermath has rightly focused on the suffering and the lost freedoms of Myanmar’s people, but, more broadly, the crisis profoundly impacts other countries in the region as well as the United States.

The coup has failed in the sense that the Myanmar military has not been able to control and govern the country.
Scot Marciel
Career Diplomat, Former U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar; Visiting Practitioner Fellow on Southeast Asia, Shorenstein APARC

Within Southeast Asia, explained Ambassador Marciel, the coup has become a complex challenge for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which has been unable to figure out how to address the crisis. By creating massive regional instability, the coup has also put the two giants on Myanmar’s borders — India and China — in a situation they dislike. “The coup has failed in the sense that the Myanmar military has not been able to control and to govern the country,” Marciel said.

As for the United and its engagement with Southeast Asia, the coup and Myanmar’s current descent further into violence are a major setback. Marciel highlighted the role the United States can play in the upcoming ASEAN summit to advance solutions to the crisis. Donahoe also emphasized the opportunity to put Myanmar at the top of the agenda of the Biden administration’s upcoming Summit for Democracy, whose three pillars are combating authoritarianism, combating kleptocracy, and protecting human rights. “These are highly relevant to the case of Myanmar, and digital technology runs through all three,” said Donahoe.

At the close of the discussion, both Donahoe and Marciel underscored the need for and opportunity in funding and training independent media groups in Myanmar, like Myanmar Now.

Despite the enormous difficulties and risks ahead, Swe Win emphasized that he and his colleagues believe the current crisis is an opportunity for greater and better changes in Myanmar. He ended the conversation on an optimistic note: “You may be depressed about what is happening in our nation and in other places, but the people of Myanmar are not depressed. As long as we are with the truth, we are always winning.”

Read More

Forest fires burn
News

Ban Ki-moon Urges Global Cooperation to Address Twin Crises of Climate Change, COVID-19

“We need an all hands on deck approach underpinned by partnership and cooperation to succeed...we must unite all global citizens and nations...indeed we are truly all in this together.”
Ban Ki-moon Urges Global Cooperation to Address Twin Crises of Climate Change, COVID-19
Mongolian parliamentary delegation
News

Mongolian Parliamentary Delegation Discusses the Nation's Democratic Future

At an in-person address to a panel of parliament members and Stanford scholars, Speaker Gombojav Zandanshatar assessed the nation's experiment in deliberative democracy and offered reflections on the challenges that face maturing democracies.
Mongolian Parliamentary Delegation Discusses the Nation's Democratic Future
Gi-Wook Shin presents the 2020 Shorenstein Journalism Award to Tom Wright at a virtual event
News

Shorenstein Journalism Award Winner Tom Wright Recounts Story of Global Financial Scandal

Wright, who led the investigation that unveiled the Malaysian 1MDB scandal, one of the largest-ever financial frauds, highlighted how Western institutions enable global corruption and undermine democracy in foreign countries with poor rule of law.
Shorenstein Journalism Award Winner Tom Wright Recounts Story of Global Financial Scandal
Hero Image
Burmese journalist Swe Win
Swe Win, chief editor of Myanmar Now, gives remarks upon receiving the Shorenstein Journalism Award, October 12, 2021.
All News button
1
Subtitle

Amidst the crisis in Myanmar, Burmese investigative journalist Swe Win, editor-in-chief of the independent news outlet Myanmar Now, continues to lead the newsroom from exile while his team is in hiding.

Authors
Michael Breger
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

On September 17, 2021, APARC hosted a delegation from the Mongolian Parliament including speaker Gombojav Zandanshatar, who addressed a joint panel of parliament members and Stanford scholars. Zandanshatar, an alumnus at the Stanford Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, instituted a program of deliberative democracy in Mongolia, and reflected on the outcomes and challenges that still affect the nation.

Zandanshatar’s work with Stanford’s Center for Deliberative Democracy has impacted political reform processes in Mongolia, and he underscored the potential for academic exchange and policy research to improve overall governance and civic participation.

Sign up for APARC newsletters to receive our experts' analysis and commentary. 


A partnership years in the making

Following Zandanshatar’s initial time as a visiting scholar at CDDRL in 2015, he returned to Mongolia, where he promoted concepts of deliberative democracy. In 2017, the Mongolian government adopted the deliberative polling method developed by Stanford communications professor James Fishkin.

Other places around the world have looked seriously at what you are doing in Mongolia.
James Fishkin
Janet M Peck Chair of International Communication, Stanford

The deliberative method that analyzes public opinion was put in place to garner public input before the Mongolian constitution could be amended. Fishkin, who devised the deliberative polling process more than 30 years ago, sat on the panel and mentioned that "other places around the world have looked seriously at what you are doing in Mongolia." 

Member of Parliament Bulgantuya Khurelbaatar also addressed the panel, discussing the country’s path towards benefiting from democracy and a market economy. Bulgantuya shared statistics of recent economic and industrial outputs, and enumerated the many challenges facing the maturing democracy. Despite Mongolia's improvements in governance, the economy, the health sector, and access to education, the poverty rate in the country remains high (28.4%), there is a serious budget deficit, and the quality of education needs improvement, said Bulgantuya.

While many are optimistic about Mongolia’s ability to remain democratic in its current geostrategic context, Zandanshatar cited professor Larry Diamond's concept of democratic recession. Zandanshatar and Bulgantuya responded to questions from Diamond and CDDRL Director Kathryn Stoner on how Mongolia is dealing with the challenges to its democracy, especially against the rise of Russia and China, two authoritarian competitors on which its economy is heavily dependent. According to the delegatiuon, "Democracy is the only way Mongolia can stay alive as a nation."  These results of the panel suggest that autocratic pressure poses an important challenge to democratic integrity.

Read More

Flags of Asian states and text "Symposium: The Stakes in Asia"
Commentary

Talking Democracy: A Symposium on Asia

On a panel discussion hosted by the political quarterly 'Democracy,' Donald K. Emmerson joins experts to assess how the Biden administration is navigating the U.S. relationships in Asia.
Talking Democracy: A Symposium on Asia
A coronavirus spinning with Mongolia flag behind
Blogs

Lessons from Mongolia’s COVID-19 Containment Strategy

Dr. Gendengarjaa Baigalimaa, an oncologist at a hospital in Mongolia’s capital and former postdoctoral fellow with APARC’s Asia Health Policy Program, explains how decisive preventative measures have helped the country prevail in the fight against COVID-19.
Lessons from Mongolia’s COVID-19 Containment Strategy
Photo clinic HEADLINE 2
News

Stanford fellow addresses burden of cervical cancer in Mongolia

Stanford fellow addresses burden of cervical cancer in Mongolia
Hero Image
Mongolian parliamentary delegation
All News button
1
Subtitle

At an in-person address to a panel of parliament members and Stanford scholars, Speaker Gombojav Zandanshatar assessed the nation's experiment in deliberative democracy and offered reflections on the challenges that face maturing democracies.

-

This event is available through livestream only. Please register in advance to receive a personalized link to watch the webinar:  https://bit.ly/3tNN7wG

Myanmar Back into Darkness: 2021 Shorenstein Journalism Award Recipient Swe Win to Headline Award Panel Discussion

The military coup in February 2021 put an abrupt end to hopes of democracy and liberty in Myanmar.  With every form of free speech now brutally suppressed, one of the major victims of the coup has been the independent press. Newsrooms were raided and dozens of journalists have been arrested. Several publications, including Myanmar Now, had their operating licenses revoked and their websites blocked. Most of the staff of the news outlets targets by the junta were forced to flee to territories along the country's border areas controlled by ethnic armed organizations. From there, they continue their professional work despite the threats to their lives and logistical difficulties.  
 

Join APARC as we honor Burmese investigative journalist Swe Win, editor-in-chief of Myanmar Now and winner of the 2021 Shorenstein Journalism Award. In his award keynote address, Swe Win will speak about journalism under threat in Myanmar, what it is like to report on the crisis in the country from outside while in exile, and Myanmar’s future.

The keynote will be followed by a conversation with Swe Win and two experts: Scot Marciel, a career diplomat, former U.S. ambassador to Myanmar, and currently a visiting practitioner fellow on Southeast Asia at APARC, and Eileen Donahoe, executive director of the Global Digital Policy Incubator at Stanford.

The event will conclude with an audience Q&A session moderated by Donald K. EmmersonDirector of the Southeast Asia Program at APARC.

Follow us on Twitter and use the hashtag #SJA21 to join the conversation.

Speakers:

Image
Photo of Swe Win, winner of 2021 Shorenstein Journalism Award
Swe Win is a Burmese journalist, human rights defender, and the chief editor of Yangon-based news outlet Myanmar Now. He has survived an assassination attempt and detention by his own government. Now he leads Myanmar Now from exile and his newsroom is in hiding.

Swe Win has written extensively on human rights cases that involve physical injury or death, unlawful detention or miscarriage of justice in Myanmar. He is the recipient of the 2019 Ramon Magsaysay Award for Emergent Leadership, which is regarded as Asia's equivalent of the Nobel Prize, the 2017 European Union’s Schuman Award for Human Rights, and the 2016 Presidential Certificate of Honor for Social Service through Journalism from the Myanmar Ministry of Information for his groundbreaking investigation into years-long abuse of domestic workers at a Yangon tailor shop.

Previously, he worked as a senior reporter for the Irrawaddy Magazine and freelanced for international publications such as the New York Times. From 1998 to 2005, he spent seven years in jail for distributing anti-junta material.

Photograph: Thet Htoo for the Mekong Review - https://mekongreview.com/cause-and-karma

 

Image
Photo of Eileen Donahoe
Eileen Donahoe is the executive director of the Global Digital Policy Incubator (GDPI) at the Cyber Policy Center at Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. GDPI is a global multi-stakeholder collaboration hub for development of policies that reinforce human rights and democratic values in digitized society. Areas of current research include AI and human rights, combating digital disinformation, and governance of digital platforms.

Donahoe served in the Obama administration as the first U.S. Ambassador to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, at a time of significant institutional reform and innovation. After leaving government, she joined Human Rights Watch as director of global affairs, where she represented the organization worldwide on human rights foreign policy, with special emphasis on digital rights, cybersecurity, and internet governance. Earlier in her career, she was a technology litigator at Fenwick & West in Silicon Valley.

She serves on the National Endowment for Democracy Board of Directors; the Transatlantic Commission on Election Integrity; the World Economic Forum Future Council on the Digital Economy; University of Essex Advisory Board on Human Rights, Big Data and Technology; NDI Designing for Democracy Advisory Board; Freedom Online Coalition Advisory Network; and Dartmouth College Board of Trustees.

 

Image
Photo of Scot Marciel
Scot Marciel is a career diplomat with 35 years of experience in Asia and around the world. He is currently a visiting practitioner fellow on Southeast Asia at Shorenstein APARC.

Mr. Marciel served as U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar from March 2016 through May 2020, leading a mission of 500 employees during the difficult Rohingya crisis and a challenging time for both Myanmar’s democratic transition and the United States-Myanmar relationship. Prior to serving in Myanmar, Ambassador Marciel served as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asia and the Pacific at the State Department, where he oversaw U.S. relations with Southeast Asia.

In previous roles, he served as U.S. ambassador to Indonesia, the first U.S. ambassador for ASEAN Affairs, deputy assistant secretary of state for Southeast Asia, at U.S. missions in Turkey, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Brazil and the Philippines, and at the State Department in Washington in multiple positions.

 


About the Shorenstein Journalism Award:

The Shorenstein Journalism Award, which carries a cash prize of US $10,000, recognizes outstanding journalists who have spent their careers helping audiences around the world understand the complexities of the Asia-Pacific region, defined broadly to include Northeast, Southeast, South, and Central Asia and Australasia. Award recipients are veteran journalists with a distinguished body of work. News organizations are also eligible for the award.

The award is sponsored and presented by the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center (Shorenstein APARC) at Stanford University. It honors the legacy of the Center’s benefactor, Mr. Walter H. Shorenstein, and his twin passions for promoting excellence in journalism and understanding of Asia. It also symbolizes the Center’s commitment to journalism that persistently and courageously seeks accuracy, deep reporting, and nuanced coverage in an age when attacks are regularly launched on the independent news media, on fact-based truth, and on those who tell it.

An annual tradition, the Shorenstein Journalism Award alternates between recipients whose work has mostly been conveyed through American news media and recipients whose work has mostly been conveyed through news media in one or more parts of the Asia-Pacific region. Included among the latter candidates are journalists who are from the region and work there, and who, in addition to their recognized excellence, may have helped defend and encourage free media in one or more countries in the region.

Learn more at https://aparc.fsi.stanford.edu/events/shorenstein-journalism-award.

Virtual Webinar Via Zoom

Register at: https://bit.ly/3tNN7wG

Swe Win <br><i>Editor-in-Chief, Myanmar Now; 2021 Shorenstein Journalism Award Winner </i><br><br>
Eileen Donahoe <br><i> Executive Director, Global Digital Policy Incubator, Stanford University </i><br><br>
Scot Marciel <br><i> Career Diplomat, Former U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar; Visiting Practitioner Fellow on Southeast Asia, Shorenstein APARC, Stanford University </i><br><br>
Panel Discussions

Shorenstein APARC
Stanford University
Encina Hall E301,
Stanford CA 94305-6055

0
ho_ki_kim.jpg

Ho Ki Kim joined the Korea Program at APARC as the 2021 Koret Fellow. Kim is a professor of sociology at Yonsei University in Korea. He received a Ph.D. from Bielefeld University in Germany.

Professor Kim is the author of Contemporary Capitalism and Korean Society (in Korean, 1995), Modernity and Social Change in Korea (in Korean, 1999), Reflections on the Civil Society in Korea  (in Korean, 2007), Zeitgesit and Intellectuals (in Korean, 2012), Adventures of Intellectuals in Modern Korea (in Korean, 2020), and "Change of Ideological Terrain and Political Consciousness in South Korea" (2005). His research interests include political sociology and modern social theories. During his stay at Stanford, Professor Kim will conduct research on democracy in Korea.

Visiting Scholar at APARC
Koret Fellow, 2021-2022
Fall 2021

Shorenstein APARC
Stanford University
Encina Hall, Room E301
Stanford, CA 94305-6055

(650) 736-0656 (650) 723-6530
0
mike_breger.jpg

Michael (Mike) Breger joined APARC in 2021 and serves as the Center's communications manager. He collaborates with the Center's leadership to share the work and expertise of APARC faculty and researchers with a broad audience of academics, policymakers, and industry leaders across the globe. 

Michael started his career at Stanford working at Green Library, and later at the Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies, serving as the event and communications coordinator. He has also worked in a variety of sales and marketing roles in Silicon Valley.

Michael holds a master's in liberal arts from Stanford University and a bachelor's in history and astronomy from the University of Virginia. A history buff and avid follower of international current events, Michael loves learning about different cultures, languages, and literatures. When he is not at work, Michael enjoys reading, painting, music, and the outdoors.

Communications Manager
Date Label
Subscribe to Democracy