International Support for a Nation in Crisis: Scot Marciel Examines Myanmar’s Struggles Toward a Democratic Future

International Support for a Nation in Crisis: Scot Marciel Examines Myanmar’s Struggles Toward a Democratic Future

As Myanmar continues to grapple with the aftermath of the 2021 military coup, APARC’s Oksenberg-Rohlen Fellow Scot Marciel explores the fundamental challenges that Myanmar must address and the role the international community can play in supporting the Myanmar people's aspirations for a more hopeful nation.
Myanmar nationals hold a sign that reads "Save Myanmar" in front of the United Nations on March 04, 2021 in Bangkok, Thailand. Myanmar nationals hold a sign that reads "Save Myanmar" in front of the United Nations on March 04, 2021 in Bangkok, Thailand. Lauren DeCicca/ Getty Images

Myanmar’s military coup has unleashed a wave of violence, instability, and immense human suffering, with no apparent resolution in sight. Despite facing violent oppression and mass arrests, a diverse group of pro-democracy actors is now engaged in an armed struggle against the military. The struggle encompasses not only ousting the brutal military junta from power but also creating a foundation for a more inclusive, federal governance system.

As the international community looks on, foreign governments must acknowledge that a return to the status quo predating the national uprising is no longer a viable option, argues veteran diplomat Scot Marciel, the Oksenberg-Rohlen Fellow at APARC. In an article published by the International Journal of Public Theology, Marciel, a former U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar, offers insights into the hurdles the nation must overcome and the role the international community can play in supporting its pursuit of democracy.

The world can and should do more to help the resistance push the military out of power, or at least weaken it to the point that it sues for peace.
Scot Marciel

Sign up for APARC newsletters to receive our scholars' commentary and analysis >


The heart of Myanmar's struggle lies in addressing two simultaneous challenges, explains Marciel. Firstly, the urgent task of ousting the oppressive military junta from power demands a united effort from the international community. Marciel highlights the importance of bolstering engagement with the pro-democracy National Unity Government and providing essential funding to strengthen its operations and communications. Additionally, the international community can play a significant role in mitigating the junta's reliance on airpower, which has led to an unprecedented number of civilian casualties. Marciel suggests offering technology, hardware, or tactical training to counter these aerial assaults.

Beyond toppling the military junta, Marciel emphasizes the need to confront Myanmar's long-neglected, fundamental issues to establish a sustainable democratic future. One of the most critical challenges is redefining the role of the military and security forces in a democratic government. Marciel argues that crafting a comprehensive security sector reform plan is imperative to transitioning to a federal military structure that includes diverse ethnic groups.
Ethnic and religious identity divisions have long plagued Myanmar. The national uprising has initiated a process of unifying resistance groups, but significant efforts are still required to build trust among different communities and forge a cohesive national identity.

Addressing post-crisis challenges is equally pressing. Marciel highlights the urgent need to provide humanitarian assistance to over a million displaced individuals affected by the military's violence. Furthermore, the country's shattered economy and education systems necessitate a carefully crafted plan for revival and reconstruction. Another critical dimension is building governance capacity at the state and local levels. With limited experience in decentralized administration, Myanmar must invest in training and resources to establish robust governance structures.

The plight of the Rohingya population also remains a significant concern for the nation's democratic future. Marciel urges a comprehensive dialogue with the Arakan Army and Rohingya representatives to determine the future of Rakhine State and ensure the protection of all communities.        
            
“The international community should recognize that there is no prospect for Myanmar to make progress as long as the junta is in power; the only hope is for the broad resistance to prevail,” writes Marciel. “The world can and should do more to help the resistance push the military out of power, or at least weaken it to the point that it sues for peace.”

Read More

U.S. President Joe Biden and his counterparts from nine Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries take part in the U.S.-ASEAN Special Summit in Washington, D.C., on May 13, 2022.
Q&As

Scot Marciel on the State of U.S.-Southeast Asia Relations

“Absent a major crisis, policy toward Southeast Asia tends to be a corollary of policies toward those major powers, most notably China.”
cover link Scot Marciel on the State of U.S.-Southeast Asia Relations
U.S. Diplomats and Stanford Scholars
News

U.S. Diplomats and Stanford Scholars Discuss Trade Arrangements in Southeast Asia, Future of ASEAN

At a meeting of U.S. ambassadors with a panel of experts from Stanford, both parties stressed the importance of consistent U.S. engagement with the region and considered the capacity of ASEAN to act on critical issues facing its member states.
cover link U.S. Diplomats and Stanford Scholars Discuss Trade Arrangements in Southeast Asia, Future of ASEAN
Overall view of members of the Four Party Joint Military delegations in a conference room
News

Decoding Diplomacy: The Dynamics of Peace Talks and Lessons from the Vietnam War

In the 'Journal of Theoretical Politics,' Center Fellow Oriana Skylar Mastro and co-author David Siegel offer a new formal model of wartime negotiations to explain why states may choose to delay or avoid talks in favor of indirect forms of bargaining. They illustrate the model’s balance using case study evidence of North Vietnam’s approach during the Vietnam War and historical examples from other cases.
cover link Decoding Diplomacy: The Dynamics of Peace Talks and Lessons from the Vietnam War